Nano Ceria as Xylene Sensor: Role of Cerium Precursor
PublicationResearch Article

Journal of Alloys and CompoundsVol. 753Pages 771-780

Nano Ceria as Xylene Sensor: Role of Cerium Precursor

DOI 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.248

31Powered by Crossref

Highlights

  • Compared cerium acetate, chloride, and nitrate precursors for spray-pyrolysis CeO2 thin films.
  • All precursors gave polycrystalline cubic-fluorite CeO2, but morphology and band gap varied with precursor choice.
  • The acetate-derived film formed nanosheets and gave the best xylene response and recovery times (224 s / 13 s) at room temperature.
  • Sensing response scaled with xylene concentration from 50 to 1000 ppm.

Abstract

Cerium oxide (CeO2) thin films were spray-deposited on glass using three different cerium precursors — an acetate, a chloride, and a nitrate salt — to see how the precursor chemistry shapes the film's structure and its ability to sense xylene, a common air pollutant. All three precursors produced polycrystalline CeO2 with the same cubic fluorite structure, but the precursor choice changed particle morphology, band gap, and sensing behavior. The acetate-derived film formed nanosheets with the smallest crystallites and gave the strongest, fastest xylene response, recovering in about 13 seconds at room temperature. The results indicate that precursor selection is a practical lever for tuning spray-pyrolysis CeO2 sensors without changing the deposition method itself.

Research summary

Xylene is a toxic aromatic hydrocarbon released by petrochemical, printing, and related industries, and even short exposures can cause headaches, dizziness, and respiratory irritation. Many metal oxide sensors already exist for detecting it, but a large share of them need elevated operating temperatures to work well, which shortens the sensor’s usable life and adds power overhead. This study looks at cerium oxide (CeO2), a rare-earth metal oxide, as a room-temperature xylene sensor, and asks how the choice of cerium precursor used during film preparation affects the film’s structure and sensing behavior.

What the study examined

  • CeO2 thin films spray-deposited on glass from three different cerium precursors: cerium acetate, cerium chloride, and cerium nitrate, with deposition conditions otherwise held constant.
  • Crystal structure and crystallite size (X-ray diffraction), surface morphology (electron microscopy), and chemical composition (FTIR, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy).
  • Optical absorbance and band gap, calculated from the film’s light-absorption behavior.
  • Room-temperature sensing response toward xylene, alongside selectivity checks against other vapors such as acetone, ethanol, and toluene.

Main findings

All three precursors produced polycrystalline CeO2 with the same cubic fluorite crystal structure, confirming that the underlying phase was not sensitive to precursor choice. What did change was morphology: the acetate precursor produced nanosheet-like assemblies with the smallest crystallite size, while the chloride and nitrate precursors produced differently shaped nanoparticles. Optical band gap also shifted with precursor choice, consistent with the differences in particle size and defect structure.

The acetate-derived film gave the clearest advantage as a sensor. Its smaller crystallites and higher surface-to-volume ratio provided more active sites for gas molecules to adsorb onto, which translated into a stronger response toward xylene. At room temperature, this film responded to xylene concentrations from 50 to 1000 ppm, with a response time of 224 seconds and a notably fast recovery time of 13 seconds. Compared with other xylene sensors reported in the literature — many of which operate at 150-400 degrees Celsius — the room-temperature operation stood out.

Why it matters

The study shows that precursor chemistry, not just the deposition technique, is a practical variable for tuning spray-pyrolysis metal oxide sensors. Because switching precursors requires no change in equipment or process, it offers a low-cost way to improve sensitivity and recovery speed. The room-temperature response toward xylene also points toward lower-power, longer-lived sensors for detecting this pollutant.

Citation

S. Dinesh Kumar, K. Arockia Jayalatha, R. Baby, Prabakaran Shankar, G. K. Mani, K. Jayanth Babu, J. B. B. Rayappan. Nano Ceria as Xylene Sensor: Role of Cerium Precursor. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 753 (2018) 771-780.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.248

Frequently Asked Questions

What problem does this study address?

Xylene is a toxic, widely used industrial solvent, and most existing xylene sensors need high operating temperatures, which hurts long-term stability. This study looks at whether a rare-earth oxide, cerium oxide (CeO2), can sense xylene at room temperature, and how the choice of starting chemical (precursor) used to make the film affects that performance.

Why compare different cerium precursors?

The same spray-pyrolysis process was used throughout, only the cerium salt in solution changed (acetate, chloride, or nitrate). Because all other conditions were held constant, differences in the resulting films could be attributed to the precursor chemistry rather than the deposition method.

Which precursor worked best, and why?

The acetate-derived film performed best. It formed nanosheet-like structures with the smallest crystallite size, which gave it more surface area for xylene molecules to interact with, producing a stronger and faster-recovering sensing response than the chloride- or nitrate-derived films.

How sensitive was the best sensor?

The acetate-based CeO2 film responded to xylene concentrations from 50 to 1000 ppm at room temperature, with a response time of 224 seconds and a recovery time of 13 seconds.