Effect of Nickel Doping on Structural, Optical, Electrical and Ethanol Sensing Properties of Spray Deposited Nanostructured ZnO Thin Films
PublicationResearch Article

Ceramics InternationalVol. 40Pages 7993-8001

Effect of Nickel Doping on Structural, Optical, Electrical and Ethanol Sensing Properties of Spray Deposited Nanostructured ZnO Thin Films

DOI 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.150

57Powered by Crossref

Highlights

  • Compared undoped and nickel-doped ZnO thin films for room-temperature ethanol sensing.
  • Crystallite size grew from about 15 to 31 nm and the optical band gap narrowed from 3.21 to 3.09 eV with increasing nickel content.
  • A 0.008 M nickel-doped film gave the best ethanol response, with roughly 50 s response and 20 s recovery times.

Abstract

Undoped and nickel-doped zinc oxide (ZnO) thin films were spray-deposited on glass and annealed, then examined by X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and electrical measurements to see how nickel doping affects structure, optical properties, and room-temperature ethanol sensing. Crystallite size increased from about 15 to 31 nm and the optical band gap narrowed from about 3.21 to 3.09 eV as nickel content increased. Among the doping levels tested, a film doped with 0.008 M nickel gave the best room-temperature response to 50 ppm ethanol, with response and recovery times of about 50 and 20 seconds.

Research summary

Metal oxide sensors that can detect ethanol vapor at room temperature, without a heater, are attractive for low-power gas sensing, but their performance depends heavily on how the sensing film is made. This study looks at whether doping zinc oxide (ZnO) thin films with nickel can improve their room-temperature ethanol response.

What the study examined

  • Undoped and nickel-doped ZnO thin films spray-deposited on glass and annealed at 723 K
  • Nickel precursor concentration varied from 0.002 to 0.010 M
  • Crystal structure (XRD), surface morphology (FESEM), optical transmittance and band gap, and electrical resistivity
  • Room-temperature response to 50 ppm ethanol vapor, including response and recovery times

Main findings

Nickel doping changed the film’s crystallite size (roughly 15 to 31 nm across the doping range) and reduced its optical band gap from about 3.21 to 3.09 eV as more nickel was added, consistent with additional defects forming in the doped films. The films stayed highly transparent throughout, with 70-80% average transmittance.

In room-temperature sensing tests against 50 ppm ethanol, the film doped with 0.008 M nickel gave the best response, with a response time of about 50 seconds and a recovery time of about 20 seconds — better than the undoped film or the other doping levels tested.

Why it matters

The results point to nickel doping as a workable route to improve ZnO’s room-temperature ethanol sensitivity, and show that there is an optimum doping level rather than a simple “more is better” trend. That is useful groundwork for later work aimed at practical, low-power ethanol sensors built on nickel-doped ZnO.

Citation

M. Indhumathy, G. K. Mani, Prabakaran Shankar, J. B. B. Rayappan. Effect of Nickel Doping on Structural, Optical, Electrical and Ethanol Sensing Properties of Spray Deposited Nanostructured ZnO Thin Films. Ceramics International 40 (2014) 7993-8001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.150

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does nickel doping help ZnO sense ethanol at room temperature?

Adding nickel changes the film's crystal structure and introduces defects that affect how oxygen and ethanol interact with the surface, which is what drives the sensing response. Most ZnO ethanol sensors normally need heating to work well, so a room-temperature response is notable.

Is more nickel always better?

No. The study found that a specific concentration, 0.008 M nickel acetate in the precursor solution, gave the best combination of response and recovery time, not the highest or lowest amount tested.

How was the sensing performance measured?

The films were exposed to 50 ppm ethanol vapor at room temperature, and the researchers tracked how quickly the electrical resistance changed (response time) and returned to baseline in clean air (recovery time).